The WP29 has published a very important guideline on Automated Decision Making and Profiling s (ARTICLE 29 DATA PROTECTION WORKING PARTY, 2018), thus providing an official interpretation of many of the issues regarding AI and GDPR. Since most AI applications depend on either Automated Decisions (as their desired output, even if using a rules-based system and not Machine Learning-type algorithms) or the building of a personal profile – profiling – to allow prediction to be mad

This blog series (A.B.C. is part of my assignment of Internet Law with Prof Cedric Manara) aims to collect your opinions, views, questions and suggestions regarding the use of AI-based internet health services, namely the risks to legally protected interests of citizens (patients using the services) namely: rights related to personal data usage. An introduction/context text is presented and then a list of reflection questions is launched, feel free to blog and respond… The 20

AI systems used in triage of patient symptoms, or any health application for that matter, that are based the creation of individual profiles - profiling techniques - even if temporary in nature, fall under data processing mechanisms for high-sensitive data. They are forbidden in principle, and possible under two relevant exceptions: 1. The provision of valid consent to be subject to automatic decision – this means Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) methodology provisio